Raising Fund I is hard.

Building a venture firm that survives to Fund IV is much harder.

Kauffman Fellows’ Zero to Four study estimates that only around 20% of venture firms progress from Fund I to Fund IV, while just 1.7% ultimately reach franchise status. That is the uncomfortable truth behind emerging manager investing: performance matters, but performance alone rarely builds an institution.

The firms that endure institutionalise deliberately. They build trust-driven partnerships, formalise decision-making, strengthen governance and turn individual judgment into repeatable organisational capability.

That’s why Emerge and KfW Capital put together a new report on exactly that journey: How to Scale a Venture Capital Fund: Lessons on Moving from Emerging Manager to Institutional-Grade Firm.

Emerge launched in 2014 with a mission to back entrepreneurs reshaping human capital development. What began as Europe’s first specialist syndicate evolved over time into an FCA-regulated, institutionally-backed venture firm focused on remaining stage- and sector-specific.

Those early years were defined by lean operations, close founder relationships and continuous iteration. At the same time, the foundations for long-term scale were already being built through sourcing infrastructure, sector-specific venture partners and systematic performance tracking.

Over time, the syndicate built a strong early track record through multiple exits, a growing portfolio and deep experience backing founders across the human capital development ecosystem.

As the firm matured, the challenge shifted from finding great companies to building a firm capable of repeating its edge across multiple fund cycles.

As Michael Porter put it, “The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do.” That idea sits at the heart of institutional venture firm-building. The best emerging managers do not scale by becoming broader. They scale by becoming more disciplined about where they have earned the right to win.

In our view, deep sector focus and institutional discipline allow emerging firms to scale without losing their edge.

From the LP perspective, emerging managers increasingly bring differentiated networks, specialist expertise and founder access into the venture ecosystem. But institutional capital also requires operational maturity, governance discipline and repeatable infrastructure much earlier in a firm’s lifecycle.

Emerge’s journey offers a useful GP perspective on what institutionalisation looks like in practice, while KfW Capital’s perspective reflects how institutional LPs increasingly assess emerging managers.

The firm began as a specialist syndicate built around founder proximity, speed and category depth. But as Emerge evolved toward Fund I and later Fund II, the challenge changed. The question was no longer only how to find great companies. It was how to build a firm capable of repeating its edge across multiple fund cycles.

That meant formal investment committees, founder scorecards, quarterly LPACs, systematic reporting and operational infrastructure capable of scaling with the platform.

The point was not to become slower or more bureaucratic. It was to build systems that allowed the firm to scale without losing the focus that made it differentiated in the first place.

From the LP perspective, operational readiness is often one of the clearest signals that a team is prepared for institutional capital. Governance structures, incentive alignment, investment processes and operational infrastructure increasingly determine whether a firm can scale sustainably over multiple fund cycles.

Strong governance creates clarity, consistency and long-term trust with institutional LPs. As Emerge scaled, LP reporting, follow-on frameworks and operational processes became increasingly systematic and repeatable across the organisation.

Another major lesson from Emerge’s evolution is the importance of automation and operational leverage inside venture firms themselves. Automation inside a venture firm is not about replacing judgment. It is about protecting judgment from operational drag.

For Emerge, that meant building systems around sourcing, thesis-fit filtering, portfolio tracking and LP reporting so the team could process more opportunities without diluting focus or adding unnecessary complexity.

The firm evolved its sourcing engine into a machine learning-powered pipeline capable of processing thousands of in-thesis opportunities each month. Operational automation and scalable reporting infrastructure allowed the platform to grow without proportionally increasing complexity or headcount.

That operational discipline ultimately changed how institutional LPs perceived the firm.

“You feel like a Fund III.“ That was the feedback KfW Capital shared with Emerge after one of the most comprehensive diligence reviews the firm had experienced.

That is the standard emerging managers should be building toward: not looking larger than they are, but operating with the clarity, discipline and reliability institutional LPs expect from firms several fund cycles ahead.

Scaling into an institutional-grade firm often comes with new expectations around governance, operational maturity and repeatability.

One of the central lessons from Emerge’s journey was how to transition from a high-energy syndicate into a repeatable institutional platform without losing the founder proximity, sector focus and speed that created its original edge.

The report developed by Emerge and KfW Capital reflects both the GP perspective on scaling a venture firm and the LP perspective on what institutional readiness increasingly requires.

If you are building toward Fund II, Fund III or institutional LP readiness, this is the operating playbook for scaling into an institutional-grade venture firm.

If you are thinking about what it takes to build an institutional-grade venture firm, you may also enjoy: